UN Global Compact Annual Review 2008: Implementation gaps exist - CSR in Europe, Middle East and Africa -
UN Global Compact Annual Review 2008: Implementation gaps exist

At the beginning of this month the UN Global Compact launched its Annual Review 2008. Let me give you a short summary of the key findings – both  positive and negative.

Let me start with positive ones: Corporations worldwide are adopting increasingly responsible business practices. The number of participating companies has risen to more than 5,000. I was happy to hear that companies from China and India have also taken an increased interest in the Global Compact and have decided to join it. This is definitely a step in the right direction to tackle human rights issues.

Let’s turn to the more unpleasant findings: There are considerable implementation shortcomings, most notably in supply chain management and subsidiary engagement. Less than ten per cent of participating corporations require their suppliers to become members of the Global Compact. It is, however, essential that responsible business practices are adopted through the complete supply chain. Finally, the increase in new participants is clouded by the delisting of 400 corporations, which failed to communicate their progress. We recently launched our 2008 Global Citizenship Report where we summarise our progress in our CSR approach.

This annual review reveals a great deal. It underlines the growing commitment of corporations adopting responsible business practices. It also reveals the challenges of effective implementation. All in all, I think we are on a good CSR path. What do you think?

Jeannette Weisschuh, Director of Global Citizenship, HP EMEA


Posted 04-29-2009 3:20 PM by jeanne2007

Comments

Bart Slob wrote re: UN Global Compact Annual Review 2008: Implementation gaps exist
on 05-04-2009 9:04 AM

Dear Jeannette,

I believe it is a good thing that the annual review identifies the existence of several implementation gaps. However, there is an even more important issue that does not appear in the review at all.

According to John Ruggie’s BASESwiki on non-judicial grievance mechanisms (http://tinyurl.com/cmdcb9), "there have been a total of 56 cases" filed under the Global Compact’s Integrity Measures. The cases include complaints and request for dialogue about alleged violations of the Compact’s principles. None of the cases are mentioned in the review. There is only a brief (under)statement on page 12: “During the year, the Global Compact engaged in a number of dialogues with CSOs around business engagement in Sudan, Zimbabwe and Myanmar, as well as on environmental issues.” I think that the Compact needs to be far more transparent and specific about the many complaints it receives every year.

The review also fails to mention how the Compact engages with critical stakeholders. For example, the CEO Water Mandate has been criticized heavily by a broad group of NGO representatives, activists and researchers, including the president of the United Nations General Assembly and his senior adviser on water, Maude Barlow. As to date, we do not know if and how the CEO Water Mandate will address the concerns of these stakeholders.

Best wishes,

Bart

Senior researcher

SOMO

www.globalcompactcritics.net

jeanne2007 wrote re: UN Global Compact Annual Review 2008: Implementation gaps exist
on 05-11-2009 3:46 PM

Dear Bart,

thanks for commenting on our blog related to the annual review of the Global Compact and for pointing us on John Ruggie´s BASESwiki. Of course a yearly review needs to be as open and transparent as possible. This is as well what HP tries to achieve with its annual Global Citizenship Report. I am not sure if you had a chance to review our 2008 report yet?! (http://www.hp.com/go/report)

Please let us know in case you learn more about how the Global Compact team is handling critical stakeholder dialogues. Could be really interesting!

Best wishes,

Jeannette

Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems