Around the Storage Block Blog : virtualization, Solid State Disk

Storage virtualization and the new EVA

CalvinZ — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:04:00 GMT

By Calvin Zito

In my first post, I gave an overview of the March 10 announcement we did. In part 2, I gave a bit more color to the StorageWorks piece of the announcement. Today, I want to talk about the new EVA6400 and EVA8400 that were announced. If you're already familiar with the EVA and it's virtualizated pool of disk drives, you can skip down to my heading titled "What's New"?

The EVA was first announced in 2001. We've shipped nearly 70,000 EVAs and nearly half of that has been in the last few years. Why so many more over the recent past - because we've been able to substantiate the ease of use benefits of the EVA and with the growth of data, I think more and more customers understand that the EVA is the easiest mid-range array to manage in the industry.

So as a short primer for those of you that maybe don't understand EVA virtualization, I'll briefly summarize it here. At it's core, virtualization is a logical abstraction of the underlying physical widgets (whether your talking servers, storage, network, etc). With the EVA, we are virtualizing at the storage system level to hide the underlying physical disk drives so that what you manage is a pool of capacity. These pools of virtual capacity can be configured as virtual disks and presented to any or all connected hosts. The EVA capitalizes on virtualization to provide optimal performance, ease of management, improved capacity utilization, powerful data replication tools, and faster rebuild times, while simplifying the management of the virtualized storage capacity. There's a lot more that we could talk about here on the EVA's virtualization capabilities but for now, I'll point you to the white paper titled Storage virtualization and the HP StorageWorks Enterprise Virtual Array. It is a good resource to get you going on the EVA and virtualization.

What's New?

So that brings me to a discussion on what's new. There are two new EVA models - the EVA6400 and EVA8400. They join the EVA4400 that we announced about a year ago when we refreshed the low end of our portfolio; this announcement refreshes the rest of the EVA family.

Here's a summary of what's new:

Support for Vraid 6 providing double the parity of Vraid5 while providing the virtualizations benefits to grow and shrink the Vraid set. Vraid6 is unique to the EVA compared to traditional arrays that deliver only RAID6.
Increased maximum LUN size up to 22TB to support applications needing larger LUNs like Microsoft and Oracle and we have also increased the number of LUNs supported (NOTE: updated this as I had a typo here in the original post. The EVA8400 supports either 14TB or 22TB of cache)
Introducing 72GB solid state drives (SSD) to support high I/O low latency applications. The EVA supports up to 8 SSD's in an array.
The EVA8400 scales to 324 disks and 324TB while the EVA6400 scales to 216 drives and 216TB. With support for the same disk drive enclosure that's supported in the EVA4400, the new EVA's offer increased performance density---more performance in the same footprint
Increased cache up to 32GB for improved application read and write performance
Increased our snapshots from 16 to 64 for increased flexibility in data mining and restores

Here are a few things you can play with to learn more about the new EVAs. The first one is a very cool 3D interactive virtual product tour. This allows you to see a 3D view of the EVA, zoom in, turn it around and really "play" with what the EVA looks like. There are two of these 3D tours, one for the EVA6400 and one for the EVA8400. Here is also a Flash-based product demo that gives a high level picture of the new EVA models. The demo has a tab titled "see it in action" - this is a simple description of how virtualization in the EVA works. Check these out and let me know what you think.

One of the main benefits we highlighted in the announcement was that the EVA costs up to 50% less to manage than other competitive traditional disk arrays. I'll discuss this more in my next post.

Changing the economics of storage infrastructure with virtualization

CalvinZ — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:30:00 GMT

By Calvin Zito

Yesterday I talked about the announcement that our Technology Solutions Group did and briefly mentioned the part HP StorageWorks had in that announcement. Today, I'll drill down a bit more into the StorageWorks news.

The current economic conditions are affecting everyone but we all know that the information explosion that we've all been talking about for over a decade doesn't seem to care much about the economy. Many customers are attempting to take costs out to free up capital for their core business processes but the continued information explosion creates specific challenges for IT to efficiently store, protect, optimize and manage data. Adding to this, many data centers are not optimized for agility; a good portion of the IT budget is spent in maintenance and operations. IT is expected to help the business take advantage of opportunities that arise in this new economic era by reacting quickly to deliver new services that help drive growth. Really nothing new here, but I wanted to set the context.

We believe that the next generation data center is core to meeting these challenges. We call this the Adaptive Infrastructure. One of the core tenants of the Adaptive Infrastructure is helping customers move from their current state of high cost IT islands and siloed people resources to low cost pooled assets with more predictable service levels. Virtualization is key to that. Many customers have already virtualized their servers and as a result there's been improvements in utilization, service provisioning and disaster recovery/availability of those servers. If the rest of your infrastructure (e.g. storage, network, etc) isn't virtualized, then you still have limited flexibility. I just saw a post by my colleague in BladeSystem Jason Newton diving deeper on this topic and it's worth a read.

These virtual server environments have unique storage challenges around capacity management, storage provisioning, and data protection/management. And that gets me to the heart of what the announcement this week is about.

Our goal is to reduce the complexities and inhibitors of virtual server environments through the intelligent use of storage virtualization. We're making investments in this technology to optimize capacity, simplify storage provisioning and improve data management across virtual IT environments.

This week's announcement was focused on Fibre Channel storage networks. But we're not suggesting this is the answer for every application or customer environment. We have a very deep (and I know at times confusing) portfolio of products and solutions. But you really don't need an infrastructure vendor who only has a hammer because then every problem looks like a nail. You need an infrastructure vendor who has the breadth of portfolio to match the solution to your specific problem and data types at the lowest cost possible. So again, this announcement is focused on Fibre Channel based solutions - as we continue to integrate LeftHand Networks into our portfolio, we'll have more to say about storage virtualization with other storage networks (Shared SAS, iSCSI, etc.).

So that brings me to the news. There were three new or updated solutions we announced:

HP StorageWorks EVA6400 and EVA8400 virtual storage arrays helps customers save up to 50% in storage management costs for common storage administrative tasks compared to competitive traditional arrays
HP StorageWorks SAN Virtualization Services Platform (SVSP) can lower TCO by pooling and sharing of heterogeneous storage resources. You can improve your capacity utilization by 300% and manage 3X the storage capacity per administrator.
The new Data Protector 6.1 software combined with the EVA offers the industry's best (and we think only) replication based Zero Downtime Backup and recovery for VMware environments and is up to 70% less expensive than other enterprise backup products.

I'll go into more details over the next several days but let me leave you with a pointer to a video by our VP of Marketing, Stephan Schmitt. Stephan is at FOSE this week and was interviewed at the event just yesterday. This video is a nice overview of the announcement.

One last footnote I have to make as I can't wait until tomorrow's post where I'll drill down on the EVA6400 and EVA8400. One of our competitors has tried to make their pre-announcement of solid state drives a year ago as a proof point of their innovation. The funny thing is that we source those drives from the same OEM partner. This competitor had made bold and frankly ridiculous predictions that we would not have SSD drives until late this year or maybe in 2010. Well, I've got news for you Chuck - we have SSD drives in the EVA now and have had them in the XP Disk Array for a few months and in our BladeSystem for even longer.

Data Placement: Who’s Architecture is Really Broken?

Anonymous — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:17:00 GMT

I just read a blog where Chuck Hollis (http://chucksblog.typepad.com/chucks_blog/2008/07/the-great-data.html) of EMC launched an attack on storage virtualization. Called us all “spindle randomizers.” He based this attack on the idea that you can’t mange performance on virtualized arrays. Chuck seems to believe that you can’t make an array perform without manually placing every byte on every platter. That’s a misguided idea that’s got to be challenged. Unfortunately Chuck seems to be missing the bigger issues. Labor has become the largest cost in an IT organization. Not software. Not hardware. Not even power & cooling. Labor! The cost to manage all of that IT infrastructure. We recently asked storage managers what they need most. Did they say capacity? No. Did they say performance? Certainly not! Their top concern is administrative costs. With the amount of digital data doubling every 18 months the top issue is managing all of that data and the infrastructure that stores it. That kind of data growth drives complexity in a big, big hurry. We’ve got to fight that complexity with simplicity at every opportunity. Storage array virtualization is a critical foundation for fighting that complexity. With it 90%+ of the storage needs can be met with a simple create, present, and let it run. You don’t have to make a bunch of extra decisions that the machine could have made just as well. And you don’t have to come back and handle simple issues that the machine can manage just fine. You’re freed up to spend your time on the hard problems, be they performance, capacity utilization, or other, where a person really adds value. Without array virtualization the mind numbing details suck up the time and keep you from the interesting and important problems. There just aren’t enough hours in the day! But what about the cases where you do need to manage the performance? Go ahead! That’s why the EVA has disk groups and performance tools. There’s nothing in a virtualized array that prevents you from doing the tuning you need. You just don’t have to when you don’t need to. That’s critical. There aren’t enough hours in the day to be tuning every LUN!

Chuck tries to paint a vision where SSD’s make manually managing all the details a requirement. A wave of the future. But that’s a productivity killing tsunami. Nobody can afford all of that time! Virtualized arrays have been handling multiple drive speeds for years. We’ll do just fine with SSD’s. The issue Chuck’s trying to hide is that EMC’s CX architecture doesn’t include storage virtualization. They’ve got an inherent limiter that’s going to be very hard to overcome. We “spindle randomizers” aren’t going to be the ones that have to live with the consequences of our architecture. It’s Chuck and company. Good luck guys!