Following on from my first post I'll take a look at the affect hardware configuration will have on the power consumption of the enclosure.
To do this I went into the Blade Power Sizer and configured up two equivalent systems. I kept the enclosure configuration constant with just 2 x Virtual Connect 1/10 Ethernet Modules and 2 x Virtual Connect Fibre Modules just to simplify the example.
The Blade configuration was BL460cG1, 2 x 2.66GHz CPUs, 16GB RAM, 2x 1Gbit Ethernet, 2x 4Gbit Fibre Channel, 2x 72GB 10K SAS Drives.
Why did I pick BL460cG1, to be honest the actual server doesn't matter, what I'm trying to show here is that the hardware configuration can have a very significant effect on the enclosure power consumption. The nice thing about the BL460cG1 for this purpose is that it shows this really clearly.
|
|
Configuration A
|
Configuration B
|
|
System
|
BL460cG1 x 16
|
BL460cG1 x 16
|
|
CPU
|
E5430 2.66GHz
|
L5430 2.66GHz
|
|
Memory
|
8 x 2GB FB-DIMMs
|
4 x 4GB LP FB-DIMMs
|
|
Base Ethernet
|
1GBit Dual-Port Multi-Function
|
1Gbit Dual-Port Multi-Function
|
|
Additional Ethernets
|
None
|
None
|
|
Fibre Channel
|
Qlogic 4Gbit
|
Qlogic 4Gbit
|
|
Drives
|
2 x 72GB 10K SAS
|
2 x 72GB 10K SAS
|
|
Enclosure
|
c7000
|
c7000
|
|
Ethernet Switches
|
Virtual Connect 1/10
|
Virtual Connect 1/10
|
|
Fibre Channel
|
Virtual Connect 4Gbit Fibre Channel
|
Virtual Connect 4Gbit Fibre Channel
|
|
Fans
|
10
|
10
|
|
Power Supply
|
HP 2250W x 6
|
HP 2400W HE x 4
|
|
Results
|
|
|
|
Idle Power
|
3698W
|
2900W
|
|
100% Load
|
5855W
|
4238W
|
The difference between the two configurations is 798W at idle and 1,617W at high load, which is a huge difference.
Where is most of the power difference coming from, well there are 3 differences in the configuration:
- CPU - E5450 (80W TDP) versus L5450 (50W TDP)
- Memory - 8 x 2GB FB-DIMMs versus 4 x 4GB Low Power FB-DIMMs
- Power Supply - HP 2250W versus HP 2400W High Efficiency
The power supply is worth about 200W (25%) at Idle and 300W (18%) at full load on this configuration. So it's a significant proportion of the difference at the idle load. At the high loads, though, the majority of the difference between the two configurations is coming from the CPU and Memory. A standard FB-DIMM takes approximately 10W per DIMM so the difference between 4 and 8 physical DIMMs is roughly 40W per server, additionally a Low Power DIMM uses 2W - 3W less than a standard DIMM.
So what can I take from this example?
- System configuration matters. A lot.
- At high loads the server power consumption is the main factor
- At low server loads the enclosure becomes a larger proportion of power consumption.
What are the practical steps I can use to reduce power consumption.
- Use the lowest power cost effective processor
- Use smallest number of largest physical DIMMs that are practical and cost effective.
- Use the highest efficiency power supply that is available
Comments as always are welcome. Let me know where you want me to go as I continue on with this series.
Part 2 of this series is Applications Matter
Posted
05-27-2009 4:06 PM
by
Tony Harvey