BSM is dead (???) - Application Management -
BSM is dead (???)

By Peter Spielvogel (Operations Center product marketing)

I had the pleasure of moderating one of the customer roundtable discussions. The topic was Consolidated Event and Performance Management. Ten customers joined three HP product experts for a guided discussion about their concerns. The goal of these discussions is to provide a forum for customers to share best practices about how they are using HP products.

We started the session by listing all the topics that people wanted to discuss. My expectation was that we would spend our time discussing Operations Manager, given the track. To my surprise, we spend less than half the time on Operations Manager. The majority of the time we discussed CMDB and discovery, monitoring applications with Business Availability Center, agentless monitoring with SiteScope, integrating events from Network Node Manager, and of course managing virtualization.

Interestingly, not once did anyone mention Business Service Management or BSM. What does this mean? My interpretation is that customers don’t buy BSM, they buy solutions for monitoring infrastructure, applications, or networks. But, vendors of these types of solutions better have ways to integrate all these events together and provide a unified view of the entire infrastructure and how they impact business services. Fortunately, HP provides such solutions, and based on the demos I observed, people are very impressed.


Posted 06-18-2009 7:50 AM by adsey007

Comments

UShah wrote re: BSM is dead (???)
on 06-18-2009 2:42 PM

Do 10 customers really represent the market? I agree with some aspects of your conclusion in that customers are interested in monitoring applications or networks, but not convinced that BSM is dead.

adsey007 wrote re: BSM is dead (???)
on 06-18-2009 3:02 PM

I thnk that BSM is an IT initiative - "make availability and performance management more aligned with the needs of the business". In very broad terms, I think it consists of the bottom up use case where you get afault and want to understand the business impact of that fault so you can prioritize and tell the business service consumers if there is going to be a problem.

And there is the top-down use case where you proactively monitor the user experience so you can work on problems when they occur, rather than when the first customer phones in.

I don't think either of these has gone away as a  requirement. I guess that right now, however, people's priorities have shifted somewhat to focus more on the fuel-efficiency of IT operations - cutting that 73-80% of IT budget that goes on "keeping the lights on".

What's interesting is that at the heart of both BSM and fuel-efficient IT Ops is the concept of integration - understanding what how different domains relate to each other. And central to that is a model of those relationships.

Ian Miller wrote re: BSM is dead (???)
on 06-18-2009 4:57 PM

I think BSM is terminology as seen from the IT department not from the business.

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Remember Me?

Type the numbers and letters above:
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems